Procedures for evaluating and prioritising the removal of fish passage barriers: a synthesis

By P. Kemp, J. O’Hanley. 2010

307 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Unintended consequences and trade-offs of fish passage (2013, methodology): “However, science-based methods of selecting dams for removal will need to become more sophisticated, comprehensive and widely employed (e.g. Kemp and O’Hanley 2010).”
Intentional Fragmentation as a Management Strategy in Aquatic Systems (2013, background): “Schemes that evaluate the costs and benefits of dam removal may recommend keeping some dams if their removal would result in the expansion of habitat for aquatic invasive species (Lavis et al. 2003, Kemp and O’Hanley 2010, Kornis and Vander Zanden 2010, Lieb et al. 2011).”
Mahseer (Tor spp.) fishes of the world: status, challenges and opportunities for conservation (2019, background): “Notwithstanding the need for appropriate design, the conservation benefits of reconnecting migratory pathways for mahseers would also critically depend on the ability of juveniles to safely navigate these structures during their downstream migration (Kemp and O’hanley 2010).”