Traits and genotypes may predict the successful training of drug detection dogs

By M. Maejima, M. Inoue‐Murayama, K. Tonosaki, N. Matsuura, Yasuhiro Saito, Alexander Weiss, Y. Murayama, S. Ito. 2007

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e61371cb9fa1f2ad070c8cf9dd3b1430fbb4563d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Samuel D. Gosling

In Genetics

1. Samuel D. Gosling
2. N. Dingemanse
3. J. Stamps
4. R. Meagher
5. S. Koski
6. K. Svartberg
7. Maryjka B. Blaszczyk
8. A. Bell

In Small Animals

1. Samuel D. Gosling
2. N. Dingemanse
3. J. Stamps
4. Maryjka B. Blaszczyk
5. S. Koski
6. R. Meagher
7. K. Svartberg
8. A. Bell

Citations in the corpus

• Are there differences between behavioral measurement methods? A comparison of the predictive validity of two ratings methods in a working dog program (2012, unknown): “In other words, idiosyncratic, individual differences in dog behavior are always observed, even when they are selected against, and a dog’s personality often impacts its success in working dog programs (Goddard and Beilharz, 1986; Maejima et al., 2007; Saetre et al., 2006; Sinn et al., 2010; Slabber”
• Personality in Non‐human Animals (2008, background): “In one study of drugdetection dogs, personality trait scores obtained after 2 weeks of training predicted the dogs’ detection success assessed after 4 months of training (Maejima et al., 2007).”