Fiber reinforcement effects on sand considering a wide cementation range
By N. Consoli, Marcio Antonio Vendruscolo, A. Fonini, F. D. Rosa. 2009
328 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Civil and Structural Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6091332713c8ded6152033f1f1bbcec08efaf4a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
- Chao‐sheng Tang
- Bin Shi
- A. R. Estabragh
- A. Zadhoush
- S. Hejazi
- Hamza Güllü
- S. M. Abtahi
- M. Sheikhzadeh
In Civil and Structural Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- A simple review of soil reinforcement by using natural and synthetic fibers (2012, background): “The triaxial peak strength increase due to fiber inclusion is more effective for smaller amounts of cement, while the increase in ultimate strength is more efficacious when fiber is added to sand improved with higher cement contents [104].”
- Effect of polypropylene fibres on the compressive and tensile strength of a soft soil, artificially stabilised with binders (2015, methodology): “A few authors have studied this theme based on triaxial tests (Consoli et al., 2009; Hamidi and Hooresfand, 2013), direct shear tests (Cai et al., 2006; Tang et al., 2007), flexural tests (Sukontasukkul and Jamsawang, 2012), isotropic compression tests (Santos et al., 2010) and cyclic shear tests…”
- Effect of freeze–thaw cycles on unconfined compressive strength of fine-grained soil treated with jute fiber, steel fiber and lime (2014, background): “This issue could bemore discussed by using the brittleness index (IB) that can show the ductile and brittle behaviors of the treatments (Consoli et al., 2009).”
- Interfacial shear strength of fiber reinforced soil (2010, background): “Therefore, they have attracted the attention of scientists worldwide, and a number of triaxial tests, unconfined compression tests, CBR tests, direct shear tests on this subject have been conducted (e.g. Ranjan et al., 1996; Kaniraj and Havanagi, 2001; Santoni et al., 2001; Prabakar andSridhar, 2002”
- Effect of fiber reinforcement on triaxial shear behavior of cement treated sand (2013, result): “The cement and fiber contents selected were consistent with those of previous studies (Haeri et al., 2005; Consoli et al., 2009) so that a comparison with their results was possible.”
- Swelling Potential of a Stabilized Expansive Soil: A Comparative Experimental Study (2017, background): “…majority of previous research regarding the fiberreinforcement technique has emphasized on the strength of coarse-grained soils (Yetimoglu and Salbas 2003; Yetimoglu et al. 2005; Consoli et al. 2009; Park 2009; Ahmed 2012; Consoli et al. 2013; Estabragh et al. 2016, to name a few).”
- Review on geotechnical engineering properties of sands treated by microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) and biopolymers (2020, background): “In general, the shear strength of cemented soils increases with an increase in the relative amount of the cementing agent [90], indicating the increase in the cohesion intercept and the angle of internal friction.”