The original Borda count and partial voting
By Peter Emerson. Social Choice and Welfare, 2013
348 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6066edec51ddb44b4b989cb21d60dbb0f1e5a88
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Gianluca Demartini
- Stefano Mizzaro
- Alessandro Checco
- Kevin Roitero
- Victor J. Wiebe
- Yingxu Wang
- Steven R. Williams
- Keith R. Leatham
Citations in the corpus
- Big Data Analytics on the Characteristic Equilibrium of Collective Opinions in Social Networks (2014, background): “Censuses and general elections are the traditional and typical domains that demand efficient big data analytic theories and methodologies beyond number counting and statistics [Emerson, 2013; Saari, 2000].”
- Journal Quality in Mathematics Education (2017, methodology): “Modifications have been made to the original Borda count procedure to accommodate partial votes (in which not everyone ranks all n candidates) and similar variations (e.g., Emerson, 2013).”
- Preferences on a Budget: Prioritizing Document Pairs when Crowdsourcing Relevance Judgments (2022, methodology): “• Borda Count (Borda) : Borda count [13] is a voting algorithm to compute a popularity score used to determine the winner of an election; such algorithm has also been used to combine document rankings from multiple IR systems [1, 12, 17, 22, 24].”