Resolution of ray-finned fish phylogeny and timing of diversification

By T. Near, R. Eytan, A. Dornburg, K. Kuhn, J. Moore, M. P. Davis, Peter C. Wainwright, M. Friedman, W. Smith. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012

922 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5f4ee4b3b32489014c85122119ee655b68c1d99

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. M. Friedman
2. Michael Benton
3. T. Near
4. P. Donoghue
5. G. Arratia
6. M. Miya

In Paleontology

1. M. Friedman
2. Michael Benton
3. T. Near
4. R. Betancur-R
5. P. Donoghue
6. J. Vinther
7. R. Asher
8. G. Ortí

Citations in the corpus

• The early evolution of ray‐finned fishes (2015, background): “A, mean molecular clock age estimates for crown Actinopterygii, Actinopteri and Neopterygii based on nuclear loci (Alfaro et al. 2009; Santini et al. 2009; Near et al. 2012; Betancur-R et al. 2013; Broughton et al. 2013; Dornburg et al. 2014).”
• Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history (2015, methodology): “Fossils from the Late Jurassic lithographic limestones of southern Germany are widely applied as fossil calibrations for the age of the teleost crown (Hurley et al., 2007; Santini et al., 2009; Near et al., 2012; Broughton et al., 2013; Betancur-R. et al., 2013).”
• Phylogenetic classification of bony fishes (2017, background): “outside [8, 10, 11, 27] Paracanthopterygii is contentious.”
• Whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes and its evolutionary consequences (2014, background): “Since Elopomorpha is the most basal teleost group (Arratia 1997; Near et al. 2012), this strongly suggests that the ancestor of all living teleosts also possessed eight Hox clusters, consistent with a WGD at the base of teleost evolution (Fig.”