The Social Ecology of Marriage and Other Intimate Unions

By T. Huston. 2000

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5f2cb5b29b71b2acd7994f692d09c55880523d3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Differences between Gay and Lesbian Cohabiting Couples (2003, background): “…satisfaction and relationship dissolution Largely consistent with previous findings from married couples (e.g., Bradbury et al., 2000; T. L. Huston, 2000; Karney & Bradbury, 1995), relationship satisfaction was linked to variables from the individual differences, relationship…”
Differences Between Partners From Heterosexual, Gay, and Lesbian Cohabiting Couples (2006, methodology): “The conceptual framework for the current article was a model of relationship adjustment that is based primarily on research involving married persons, most likely with children (Huston, 2000; Karney & Bradbury, 1995).”
What Do We Know About Gay and Lesbian Couples? (2005, methodology): “The predictors of relationship quality that have been examined usually come from four classes of variables commonly used in research on relationships (e.g., Huston, 2000 ).”
Marital Quality and Personal Well‐Being: A Meta‐Analysis (2007, background): “…that future research pay increasing attention to the social contexts in which marriages are embedded as well as the workplace and its policies, all of which might influence the association between marital quality and personal well-being (Bradbury & Karney, 2004; Helms & Demo, 2005; Huston, 2000).”
Together is better? Effects of relationship status and resources on young adults' well-being (2008, background): “In addition, Reis, Capobianco and Tsai (2002) and Huston (2000) describe that a person’s behavior depends on both the self and the interpersonal situation.”
How was your day? Couples’ affect when telling and hearing daily events (2008, background): “Given the extensive research demonstrating that romantic partners reciprocally influence one another’s feelings and behaviors, it is reasonable to expect that hearing about a romantic partner’s positive and negative experiences has implications for one’s own affective state (a process we call crosso”
Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Contextual Factors in Engaging in and Responding to Extramarital Involvement (2006, background): “’s (1983) or Huston’s (2000) analysis of relationship events in terms of personal, relational, and environmental factors:”