Accurate indoor localization with zero start-up cost

By Swarun Kumar, Stephanie Gil, Dina Katabi, Daniela Rus. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, 2014

406 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Survey of Indoor Localization Systems and Technologies (2017, background): “points for signal collection [21], basic localization systems (that can achieve reasonable localization accuracy) can be built without the need for additional infrastructure.”
ToneTrack: Leveraging Frequency-Agile Radios for Time-Based Indoor Wireless Localization (2015, background): “Ubicarse [19] takes this one step further by making the smartphone emulate a synthetic aperture radar through user induced motion.”
SpotFi: Decimeter Level Localization Using WiFi (2015, methodology): “…WiFi deployments, although the estimated ToF values are different from the absolute ToFs, the joint estimation procedure provides AoA accuracy that is comparable to systems that require twice as many antennas [8] or non-standard conﬁgurations such as rotating antennas used in radar [6, 2].”
Decimeter-Level Localization with a Single WiFi Access Point (2016, background): “State-of-theart systems have achieved an accuracy of tens of centimeters , even using commodity WiFi chipsets [30] [32] [18].”
Wi-Fi Fingerprint-Based Indoor Positioning: Recent Advances and Comparisons (2016, background): “may target at higher accuracy with information of human body and gesture recognition [196], [218].”
mD-Track: Leveraging Multi-Dimensionality for Passive Indoor Wi-Fi Tracking (2018, background): “bining adjacent channels to form a larger bandwidth with channel hopping [19, 46, 50].”