Exact Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations
By K. J. V. Garderen, Chandravadan Shah. 2002
236 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5d13c98b1a4bea75669d6fbbf3de71a1b96d922
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- The Effects of Non-Tariff Measures on Prices, Trade, and Welfare: CGE Implementation of Policy-Based Price Comparisons (2004, methodology): “Kennedy (1981) notes that the Halvorson/Palmquist transformation is biased upward, and develops a correction.12 More recently van Garderen and Shah (2002) argue that the Kennedy correction should be used with an approximate unbiased variance estimator to construct tstatistics.13 Thus, the NTM price…”
- Does energy efficiency matter to home-buyers? An investigation of EPC ratings and transaction prices in England (2015, methodology): “1 The ‘raw’ coefficients of the EPC dummy variables require adjustment to determine the percentage premiums (or discounts) as suggested by Halvorsen and Palmquist (1980) and Giles (2011): our simplified adjustment formula follows the van Garderen and Shah (2002) method where the proportional impact ”
- Interpreting Dummy Variables in Semi-logarithmic Regression Models: Exact Distributional Results (2011, unknown): “Van Garderen and Shah (2002) offer some further insights into the accuracy of this approximation, and provide strong evidence that favours its use.”
- Land property rights, agricultural intensification, and deforestation in Indonesia (2018, background): “(2) is a dummy variable, so that the percentage effects is calculated as {exp[β1− 0.5×Var(β1)]− 1} (van Garderen and Shah, 2002).”
- The Limits of Model-based Regulation (2014, unknown): “The last two lines of Panel A include adjusted coefficients and estimates for the standard errors, following the reasoning of Halvorsen and Palmquist (1980), Kennedy (1981), and van Garderen and Shah (2002) (see footnote 36).”
- The Use (and Abuse) of Meta-Analysis in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: An Assessment (2009, unknown): “While 27 A possible “quality” indicator is publication status of each primary study, included in several studies as an explanatory variable (e.g., Van Houtven et al. 2007; van Kooten et al. 2004, 2007).”
- Going NUTS: The Effect of EU Structural Funds on Regional Performance (2010, unknown): “Hence, Objective 1 treatment caused absolute GDP to change by about 14Note that the semi-logarithmic equations we estimate would actually require a slight transformation of the estimated coefficients following Van Garderen and Shah (2002).”
- Energy Performance Ratings and House Prices in Wales: An Empirical Study (2015, unknown): “Adjusting the coefficients of the semilogarithmic estimation for potential bias as proposed by Kennedy (1981) and van Garderen & Shah (2002) yields minimally different effects in the order of magnitude of 0.01%.”