First-Order Recurrent Neural Networks and Deterministic Finite State Automata
By P. Manolios, Robert Fanelli. 1994
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Henrik Jacobsson
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Ramón P. Ñeco
- C. Lee Giles
- Christian Walter Peter Omlin
- Mikel L. Forcada
- Yoav Goldberg
- Alan D. Blair
Citations in the corpus
- Deep learning in neural networks: An overview (2014, methodology): “LSTM clearly outperformed previous RNNs on tasks that require learning the rules of regular languages describable by deterministic Finite State Automata (FSAs) (Watrous and Kuhn, 1992; Casey, 1996; Siegelmann, 1992; Blair and Pollack, 1997; Kalinke and Lehmann, 1998; Zeng et al., 1994; Manolios and ”
- Architectural Bias in Recurrent Neural Networks: Fractal Analysis (2002, background): “However, it has been known for some time that when training RNNs to process symbolic sequences, activations of recurrent units display a considerable amount of structural difierentiation even prior to learning (Christiansen & Chater, 1999; Kolen, 1994; Kolen, 1994a; Manolios & Fanelli, 1994).”
- Learning to count without a counter: A case study of dynamics and activation landscapes in recurrent networks (1995, unknown): “…(e.g., of the sort reported in Cleeremans, Servan-Schreiber, & McClelland, 1989; Elman, 1991; Giles, Miller, Chen, Chen, Sun, & Lee, 1992; Manolios & Fanelli, 1994; Watrous & Kuhn, 1992) or else to establish theoretical capacity through formal analysis (Kolen, 1994; Pollack, 1991;…”
- Bridging Long Time Lags by Weight Guessing and \Long Short Term Memory" (1996, unknown): “See, e.g., [2, 32, 22, 17, 16].”
- Extraction of rules from discrete-time recurrent neural networks (1996, background): “The performance of recurrent networks on long temporal sequences is naturally explored by using grammatical strings (Manolios & Fanelli, 1994).”
- Rule Extraction from Recurrent Neural Networks: ATaxonomy and Review (2005, methodology): “…2003), SOM (Tiˇno & ˇSajda 1995, Tiˇno & Vojtek 1998, Blanco et al. 2000), dynamical cell structures (Tiˇno & K¨oteles 1999), “other” vector quantifiers (Manolios & Fanelli 1994), hierarchical clustering (Alqu´ezar & Sanfeliu 1994 a ), dynamically updated intervals (Watrous & Kuhn 1992) and…”
- Analysis of Dynamical Recognizers (1997, methodology): “One of the principal themes has been the use of clustering and minimization techniques to extract a Finite State Automaton (FSA) that approximates the network's behavior (Giles et al., 1992, Manolios & Fanelli, 1994, Ti no & Sajda, 1995).”
- Asynchronous translations with recurrent neural nets (1997, background): “In recent years, there has been a lot of interest in training discrete-time recurrent neural networks (DTRNN) to behave as finite-state machines [7, 9, 13, 17, 18, 20].”