Addendum on the scoring of Gaussian directed acyclic graphical models
By Jack Kuipers, Giusi Moffa, David E. Heckerman. 2014
84 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We provide a correction to the expression for scoring Gaussian directed acyclic graphical models derived in Geiger and Heckerman (2002) [Annals of Statistics, 20, 1414-1440] and discuss how to evaluate the score efficiently.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability, Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Yoshua Bengio
- Stefan Bauer
- André F. T. Martins
- Anirudh Goyal
- Eric P. Xing
- Alexandre Lacoste
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Jonas Rothfuss
In Statistics and Probability
- Ricardo M. A. Silva
- Mário A. T. Figueiredo
- André F. T. Martins
- Gonçalo Faria
- Mikko Koivisto
- Antti Hyttinen
- Johan Pensar
- Jussi Viinikka
In Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods
- Yoshua Bengio
- Anirudh Goyal
- Stefan Bauer
- Antti Hyttinen
- Johan Pensar
- Jussi Viinikka
- Mikko Koivisto
- Polina Suter
Citations in the corpus
- Bayesian Structure Learning with Generative Flow Networks (2022, neutral): “Examples of modular scores include the BDe score (Heckerman et al., 1995) and the BGe score (Geiger and Heckerman, 1994; Kuipers et al., 2014).”
- Causal Inference through a Witness Protection Program (2014, methodology): “This is analogous to the binary case, where here we use the corrected BGe score (Kuipers et al., 2014).”
- DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learning (2018, background): “This can be written as the following combinatorial optimization problem: Popular score functions include BDe(u) (Heckerman et al., 1995), BGe (Kuipers et al., 2014), BIC (Chickering and Heckerman, 1997), and MDL (Bouckaert, 1993).”
- Efficient Sampling and Structure Learning of Bayesian Networks (2018, methodology): “For continuous multivariate Gaussian data, the inverse Wishart prior leads to the BGe score (Geiger and Heckerman, 2002; corrected in Kuipers et al., 2014).”
- Towards Scalable Bayesian Learning of Causal DAGs (2020, methodology): “With the notation αμ and αw we adhere to the choices in the key references [9, 17].”
- Variational Causal Networks: Approximate Bayesian Inference over Causal Structures (2021, methodology): “Calculate the per-sample marginal log-likelihood log p ( D|G ( i ) ) by marginalising θ to obtain the BGe Score [10, 23]. φ ← Update parameters using gradients g .”
- Partition MCMC for Inference on Acyclic Digraphs (2015, methodology): “We work with the BGe score (Geiger and Heckerman 1994; Heckerman and Geiger 1995; Geiger and Heckerman 2002), corrected as in Consonni and Rocca (2012) and Kuipers, Moffa, and Heckerman (2014) and sped up following Kuipers, Moffa, and Heckerman (2014).”
- Differentiable Causal Discovery Under Latent Interventions (2022, methodology): “…constrained optimization methods for finding a DAG ( directed acyclic graph ); other approaches include constraint-based (Spirtes et al., 1993; Pearl, 2000; Spirtes et al., 2013) and score-based methods (Bouckaert, 1993; Heckerman et al., 1994; Chickering and Heckerman, 1997; Kuipers et al., 2021).”