Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing of Titanium Components: Properties and Performance

By P. Edwards, A. O'Conner, M. Ramulu. 2013

406 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5910140f8c4390c3266ccf84e4ee3106041ca2c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. T. Mukherjee
2. T. DebRoy
3. H. Wei
4. Amitava De
5. Wei Zhang
6. J. Elmer
7. J. Milewski
8. J. Zuback

In Materials Chemistry

1. T. Mukherjee
2. T. DebRoy
3. H. Wei
4. J. Elmer
5. Stewart W. Williams
6. Wei Zhang
7. Iain Todd
8. Tzu‐Liang Bill Tseng

In Mechanical Engineering

1. T. DebRoy
2. T. Mukherjee
3. H. Wei
4. Amitava De
5. Wei Zhang
6. J. Elmer
7. J. Zuback
8. J. Milewski

Citations in the corpus

• A review on quality control in additive manufacturing (2018, methodology): “Edwards et al. (2013) attempted to remove post process on EBMprinted alloy parts by using the elevating bad temperature to minimize residual stresses (Edwards et al., 2013).”
• Electron beam melted Ti–6Al–4V: Microstructure, texture and mechanical behavior of the as-built and heat-treated material (2016, background): “As already highlighted by previous authors [13], designers should keep in mind that the tensile properties of machined parts might be consistently higher than those of as-built parts.”
• Process defects and in situ monitoring methods in metal powder bed fusion: a review (2017, neutral): “Porosity Porosity is particularly critical for most metal AM applications because it strongly impacts the fatigue performances and the crack growth characteristics of the part (Edwards et al ., 2013).”
• Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties (2018, background): “Measure of anisotropy in additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V with (a) transverse versus longitudinal tensile strength [17,150,435,442,511,513, 515,516,521,524,534,535,538,539,544,546] and (b) transverse versus longitudinal ductility) [17,150,435,442,511,513,514,516,521,524,534,535,538,539, 544,545].”