A Review of ETS Differential Item Functioning Assessment Procedures: Flagging Rules, Minimum Sample Size Requirements, and Criterion Refinement
By R. Zwick. 2012
169 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e58612f49a60d46b45964e35d0547ffecccb6ab7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Information Systems
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 2010-11 (ECLS-K:2011). User's Manual for the ECLS-K:2011 Kindergarten Data File and Electronic Codebook, Public Version. NCES 2015-074. (2015, unknown): “The M-H odds ratio is defined as follows (Zwick 2012):”
- ETS CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ITEM, TEST, AND SCORE FAIRNESS (2013, background): “Zwick (2012) reviewed the status of ETS DIF analysis procedures, focusing on three aspects: (a) the nature and stringency of the statistical rules used to flag items, (b) the minimum sample size requirements that are currently in place for DIF analysis, and (c) the efficacy of criterion refinement.”