Threat, Anxiety, and Support of Antiterrorism Policies
By L. Huddy, S. Feldman, Charles Taber, Gallya Lahav. 2005
959 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e555f0b5e41725f0fc888db56ec6af62e518445f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Eran Halperin
- D. Bar-Tal
- Ruthie Pliskin
- Christopher R. Weber
- Daphna Canetti
- David Weisburd
- Tal Jonathan-Zamir
- Nicholas A. Valentino
In Sociology and Political Science
- Eran Halperin
- D. Bar-Tal
- Ruthie Pliskin
- Nicholas A. Valentino
- Daphna Canetti
- Rafi Nets-Zehngut
- Christopher R. Weber
- Tal Jonathan-Zamir
Citations in the corpus
- The Effects of Security Threats on Antecedents of Police Legitimacy (2011, background): “For example, Huddy et al. (2005) examined the effects of perceptions of threat versus feelings of anxiety concerning terrorism in the United States, and found correlations between perceived terrorism threat and a desire for forceful counterterrorism measures, both domestic and international, such…”
- Cognitive Biases and the Strength of Political Arguments (2012, result): “Moreover, the findings demonstrate that under certain conditions fear responses can lead to risk acceptance, which is contrary to the accepted wisdom (Huddy et al. 2005; Lerner et al. 2003; Meijinders, Midden, and Wilke 2001).”
- The Islamophobia Scale: Instrument Development and Initial Validation (2009, background): “Research on post-9/11 sentiment has shown that fear is a significant predictor of support for policies designed to avoid or escape contact with Muslims, such as the deportation of Muslims ( Skitka, Bauman, Aramovich, & Morgan, 2006 ) and the isolation of the United States in world affairs ( Huddy, F”
- Exposure to Violence, Ethos of Conflict, and Support for Compromise (2017, background): “This context of threat promotes high favorable attitudes toward the in-group and increased animosity toward the rivals (Greenberg, Koole, and Pyszczynski 2004; Huddy et al. 2005) and even toward out-groups unrelated to the threat (Riek, Mania, and Gaertner 2006; Stephan, Renfro, and Davis 2008).”
- The Emotional Citizen: Emotion as a Function of Political Sophistication (2011, background): “…(Abelson et al. 1982; Ottati, Steenbergen, and Riddle 1992), perceptions of officeholder performance (Conover and Feldman 1986), support for public policies (Huddy, Jones, and Chard 2 2001; Huddy et al. 2005; Pagano and Huo 2007), and how the public reacts to campaign appeals (Brader 2006).”