Polychaete tubes create ephemeral community patterns: Lanice conchilega (Pallas, 1766) associations studied over six years
By R. Zühlke. 2001
85 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e54fcb83a3a3413130f0fcbc4a5ad7eccc2d9c96
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- Tube worms promote community change (2006, background): “Past studies of intertidal and subtidal areas have shown that dense aggregations of Lanice conchilega comprising several thousand individuals m–2 host a different and often particularly diverse benthic community compared to tube-free areas (Zühlke 2001, Rees et al. 2005).”
- A bio-engineered soft-bottom environment: The impact of Lanice conchilega on the benthic species-specific densities and community structure (2007, background): “In intertidal areas, the tube patches are known to have consequences for the distribution and abundance of infaunal species by influencing the habitat structure (Carey, 1987; Feral, 1989; Zühlke et al., 1998; Dittmann, 1999; Zühlke, 2001; Callaway, 2006).”
- Macroalgal distribution patterns in a shallow, soft-bottom lagoon, with emphasis on the nonnativeGracilaria vermiculophylla andCodium fragile (2006, unknown): “Facilitation by this association (Woodin 1978; Bell and Coen 1982), along with its environmental tolerance, may lead to a high invasion potential along the U.S. east coast and in other areas where soft-bottom polychaetes can facilitate spatial fixation (Reise 1983; Zuhlke 2001).”
- Ecological implications of the presence of the tube-building polychaete Lanice conchilega on soft-bottom benthic ecosystems (2008, background): “conchilega patches in intertidal areas (Zühlke et al. 1998; Zühlke 2001; Callaway 2003a, b, 2006) and even around artiWcial tubes (Zühlke et al.”