Design of Subarrayed Linear and Planar Array Antennas With SLL Control Based on an Excitation Matching Approach

By Luca Manica, Paolo Rocca, Andrea Massa. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2009

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Irregular Phased Array Tiling by Means of Analytic Schemata-Driven Optimization (2017, background): “Another key advantage in preferring w to c for saving computational resources lies in the cardinality of the corresponding solution space, indeed it drastically reduces from QM×N [12] to (5).”
Unconventional Phased Array Architectures and Design Methodologies—A Review (2016, methodology): “For linear array configurations, the optimization of both the number of elements within each subarray and the subarray weights has shown better cost/performance tradeoffs with respect to architectures using amplitude tapers at both the element and subarray level, or just subarrays of random sizes [2”
A review on array mutual coupling analysis (2011, background): “Irregular arrays [Manica et al., 2009] may mitigate those grating lobes, but when such arrays are limited to very few elements, a proper control of the level of sidelobes may require quite small average spacings [Bucci et al., 2010].”