Catastrophic Forgetting and the Pseudorehearsal Solution in Hopfield-type Networks
By Anthony V. Robins, Simon McCallum. 1998
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Yoshua Bengio
- Tyler L. Hayes
- Christopher Kanan
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Sergey Levine
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Razvan Pascanu
- Trevor Darrell
Citations in the corpus
- Structural Synaptic Plasticity Has High Memory Capacity and Can Explain Graded Amnesia, Catastrophic Forgetting, and the Spacing Effect (2014, background): “Alternative high level mechanisms for preventing CF involve pseudo-rehearsal using self-generated training stimuli from previously learned memories [92].”
- Replay in Deep Learning: Current Approaches and Missing Biological Elements (2021, positive): “This mechanism is the basis of replay in computational models of attractor networks (Crick & Mitchison, 1983; Robins & McCallum, 1998, 1999).”
- Functional Regularisation for Continual Learning using Gaussian Processes (2019, background): “This idea has been explored before (e.g. Robins & McCallum, 1998) although recent progress in generative modelling continues to make the idea of pseudorehearsals an attractive and simple alternative.”
- Label Mapping Neural Networks with Response Consolidation for Class Incremental Learning (2019, methodology): “A general and straightforward solution to the catastrophic forgetting problem is Rehearsal [11]: the neural network is able to retrain by the old classes while learning new classes.”
- Critical periods and catastrophic interference effects in the development of self-organizing feature maps. (2008, background): “…typically qualitative in nature (e.g. catastrophic interference effects: French & Chater, 2002; McCloskey & Cohen, 1989; Ratcliff, 1990; Robins, 1995; Robins & McCallum, 1998; Sharkey & Sharkey, 1995; critical period effects: McClelland et al., 1999; Oliver et al., 2000; O’Reilly & Johnson, 1994).”
- Controlling Recurrent Neural Networks by Conceptors (2014, background): “Although a number of proposals have been made which partially alleviate the problem in special circumstances ([32, 42, 73], skeptical overview: [77]), catastrophic forgetting was still considered a main challenge for neural learning theory in an expert’s hearing solicited by the NSF in 2007 ([21]).”
- Structural plasticity, cortical memory, and the spacing effect (2009, unknown): “In this work, I present additional simulations and analyses suggesting that networks employing structural plasticity suffer to a much lesser degree from catastrophic forgetting than models without structural plasticity [3] if the number of consolidated synapses remains sufficiently low.”
- Sequential learning in neural networks: A review and a discussion of pseudorehearsal based methods (2004, unknown): “Figure 4 summarises results from simulations in [58].”
- Catastrophic forgetting in simple networks: an analysis of the pseudorehearsal solution. (1999, background): “Similar issues have been explored in Hopfield networks [15, 1, 20]§.”
- Neural networks with a self-refreshing memory: Knowledge transfer in sequential learning tasks without catastrophic forgetting (2000, background): “It must be noticed that pseudorehearsal was explored in the framework of Hop eld-type nets (Robins and McCallum 1998), where extra (or ‘spurious’) attractors created in state space during learning are exploited for preserving a previously learned population.”
- The consolidation of learning during sleep: comparing the pseudorehearsal and unlearning accounts (1999, unknown): “The two methods explored are the " pseudorehearsal " method (Robins, 1995; Robins & McCallum, 1998) and the " unlearning " method (Hopfield, Feinstein & Palmer, 1983; Crick & Mitchison, 1983).”