Risk of multiple interacting tipping points should encourage rapid CO2 emission reduction

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The appallingly bad neoclassical economics of climate change (2020, unknown): “…my interpretation of the paper was correct, and that there were several other papers which also strongly reject the proposition that a smooth function is appropriate for assessing the dangers from climate change (Cai et al., 2016; Kriegler et al., 2009; Lenton et al., 2019; Lenton & Ciscar, 2013).”
The impact of climate change and the social cost of carbon (2018, background): “…survey was completed, 534 estimates have been published in 14 new studies (Ackerman and Munitz, 2016, Adler et al., 2017, Budolfson et al., 2017, Cai et al., 2016, Dayaratna et al., 2017, Dennig et al., 2015, Freeman and Groom, 2014, Freeman et al., 2015, Freeman and Groom, 2016, Hatase and…”
Pricing Uncertainty Induced by Climate Change (2020, background): “Within the confines of risk analyses, important research on climate tipping points has been done by Lenton et al. (2008), Cai et al. (2015), Cai, Lenton, and Lontzek (2016), and Cai, Judd, and Lontzek (2017).”