Genetically modified crops in the European Union: regulatory conflicts as precautionary opportunities

By Les Levidow, S. Carr, D. Wield. 2000

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Systemic risks of genetically modified crops: the need for new approaches to risk assessment (2011, background): “the effects of the herbicides used together with herbicide tolerant crops, as demanded by the legal framework, how to deal with the foreseeable EU-wide use of antibiotic marker genes in foodstuff made out of GM crops containing these transgenes and how to evaluate the research work pointing to consi”
NOVEL FOOD, NEW MARKETS AND TRUST REGIMES: Responses to the erosion of consumers' confidence in Austria, Italy and the UK (2001, background): “On the whole, even markedly pro-GMO governments, like the UK, have reconsidered questions they had previously dismissed or of cially resolved and have devised more precautionary measures, such as increasing the amount of evidence for demonstrating safety (Levidow et al. 2000; Levidow and Carr 2000).”
Wrestling with uncertain risks: EU regulation of GMOs and the uncertainty paradox (2008, background): “2007 ; Jasanoff 2005 ; Levidow 2001 ; Levidow, Carr, and Wield 2000 , 2005 ; Levidow, Murphy, and Carr 2007 ; Tait 2001; Wynne 2001 ), it is striking that notwithstanding the political turbulence about possible authorization of these three GMOs, in the end the decisions about the import were t”