Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe

By Timothy J. Andrews, Michael P. Ewbank. NeuroImage, 2004

383 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5243448e1dcbf8a7003b9bfb6f6e318711db51c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Different Neural Mechanisms within Occipitotemporal Cortex Underlie Repetition Suppression across Same and Different-Size Faces (2012, positive): “…cortex—the occipital face area (OFA) and the fusiform face area (FFA)—show RS to repeated presentations of the same facial identity (compared with different identities) that persists across changes in image size (Andrews and Ewbank 2004; Kovacs et al. 2008; Cziraki et al. 2010; Lee et al. 2011).”
Object-Specific Semantic Coding in Human Perirhinal Cortex (2014, background): “Object-category groupings were present in left LOC and overlapped with previously reported peak coordinates for the contrast of animals greater than tools (Chao et al., 2002) and a lateral object-specific region (Andrews and Ewbank, 2004).”
Separate Coding of Different Gaze Directions in the Superior Temporal Sulcus and Inferior Parietal Lobule (2007, positive): “First, different people’s faces were used in the ‘‘topup’’ and probe face events of the adaptation trials (Figure 1), hence, the effects cannot reflect adaptation of facial identity, which previous research has attributed to the posterior fusiform gyrus [7, 12, 13, 36].”
The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces (2006, background): “Indeed, several studies have found adaptation across repeated images of the same face even when those images differ in position (Grill-Spector et al. 1999), image size (Grill-Spector et al. 1999; Andrews & Ewbank 2004) and spatial scale (Eger et al. 2004).”
Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions (2011, positive): “…that depend on the moving components of a face (e.g., the eyes and the mouth), including facial expression processing (Winston et al., 2004; Andrews and Ewbank, 2004; Engell and Haxby, 2007; Said et al., 2010), gaze discrimination (Hoffman and Haxby, 2000; Pelphrey et al., 2003a, 2003b,…”
Gaze Cueing of Attention (2007, background): “…eye gaze) are processed in functionally separate systems to those that involve analysis of invariant features (e.g., identity and gender; Andrews & Ewbank, 2004; Bruce & Young, 1986; Haxby et al., 2002; Hoffman & Haxby, 2000; but see Calder & Young, 2005, for arguments that suggest that…”