How smart is your tourist attraction?: Measuring tourist preferences of smart tourism attractions via a FCEM-AHP and IPA approach

By Xia Wang, X. Li, F. Zhen, Jinhe Zhang. 2016

361 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e504324d301e80a084bc4ddb28a646590b9c02a2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. Hyejo Shin
2. J. Ivars-Baidal
3. J. Perles-Ribes
4. Francisco Femenia-Serra
5. Miyoung Jeong

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Hyejo Shin
2. J. Ivars-Baidal
3. J. Perles-Ribes
4. Francisco Femenia-Serra
5. Miyoung Jeong

Citations in the corpus

• Smart destinations and tech-savvy millennial tourists: hype versus reality (2019, background): “…to discriminate the students who were born between 1982 and 2002 (millennials), the first block gathered data on mobile technologies use in travel context: types of devices used, purposes of use (adapted from D. Wang et al., 2014; 2016) and intensity of use through a five-point Likert scale.”
• Tourists’ Experiences with Smart Tourism Technology at Smart Destinations and Their Behavior Intentions (2019, background): “Studies (e.g., Carbonell and Escudero 2015; Ozturk and Hancer 2015; X. Wang et al. 2016) have investigated how technology affected consumers’ memorable experience, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions.”