Effect of microstructural topology upon the stiffness and strength of 2D cellular structures

By A. Fazekas, R. Dendievel, L. Salvo, Y. Bréchet. 2002

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dynamic crushing of 2D cellular structures: A finite element study (2005, methodology): “Using the finite element method, intact and damaged honeycombs [12], Voronoi honeycombs [13,14] and their extension exhibiting bimodal or multimodal cell size distributions [15] were employed to analyze the influence of the imperfection on the static crushing behavior.”
Dynamic crushing and energy absorption of regular, irregular and functionally graded cellular structures (2011, background): “…effect of different defects and structural variations on the quasi-static behavior of cellular structures (Ajdari et al., 2008; Chen et al., 1999; Fazekas et al., 2002; Fortes and Ashby, 1999; Guo and Gibson, 1999; Silva et al., 1995; Silva and Gibson, 1997; Wang and Mcdowell, 2003; Zhu et al.,…”
Steel foam for structures: A review of applications, manufacturing and material properties (2012, unknown): “It is implicitly assumed throughout the literature that foams of a given base material and relative density will behave the same [38]; however, as Table 4 highlights the material properties depend upon the manufacturing method [39], cell size and morphology [40], and sample size tested [41].”