SAR: A sentiment-aspect-region model for user preference analysis in geo-tagged reviews
By Gao Cong, Quan Yuan, Kenny Q. Zhu. 2015
77 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Transportation
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems
In Sociology and Political Science
In Transportation
Citations in the corpus
- Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectives (2018, methodology): “Zhao et al. [2014] represented products and users in the same demographic feature space, and used the weights of the demographic features learned by a ranking function to intuitively explain the results; Zhao et al.”
- Rank-GeoFM: A Ranking based Geographical Factorization Method for Point of Interest Recommendation (2015, background): “Other types of contexts utilized in POI recommendation include category of POI [13], text description of POI [23, 12, 10, 8, 26], and currently-visited POI [4, 6].”
- Joint Representation Learning for Top-N Recommendation with Heterogeneous Information Sources (2017, unknown): “Furthermore, [4] proposed a Sentiment Utility Logistic Model to recommend not only items but also item aspects to provide beer experience for the users, and [43] jointly considered sentiment, aspect, and regional features based on geographical topic modeling for location-aware recommendation.”
- ReEL: Review Aware Explanation of Location Recommendation (2018, result): “Contrary to that, some of the studies [17, 18, 35, 36, 40, 41, 43, 57] have already claimed the user persuasiveness due to explainability in real-world systems.”
- Bridging Collaborative Filtering and Semi-Supervised Learning: A Neural Approach for POI Recommendation (2017, background): “While traditional recommender systems mostly work with ratings and reviews [20], POI recommendations naturally come with various context, such as geographical information [24, 25, 28, 47, 49], categorical information [53, 55], social information [22, 38, 50, 52], temporal information [48, 56], etc.”