Further validation of actigraphy for sleep studies.

By Luciane L. de Souza, A. A. Benedito-Silva, M. L. Pires, D. Poyares, S. Tufik, H. Calil. Sleep, 2003

597 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4db6775ce277e3dc31164b5669d0a4c05ee4934

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. V. Kapur
2. J. Owens

In Physiology

1. V. Kapur

Citations in the corpus

• Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the assessment of sleep and sleep disorders: an update for 2007. (2007, methodology): “2 (4-12) Significant differences in number of movements according to diagnostic category 54% diagnosed with sleep disordered breathing, 38% primary snoring or normal PSG, and 15% with PLMD Actiwatch-64 (MM) Start: End: Durat:overnight Actiwatch-PLMs software Derived from ASDA criteria, w/ 2 sec asse”
• Sleep duration: how well do self-reports reflect objective measures? The CARDIA Sleep Study (2008, background): “Most studies of healthy individuals have not found systematic bias, although 1 study found overestimation.(38) Actigraphy has recently been added to several large population-based cohorts, including the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN)(39) and the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.”