Carbon sequestration and the role of biological carbon mitigation: A review

By Damien J. Farrelly, C. Everard, C. Fagan, Kevin P. McDonnell. 2013

246 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4d8f8e0a44880e03306ed1b85c8869b838d72af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Wenguang Zhou
2. R. Hill
3. R. Ranjith Kumar
4. Peter J. Ralph
5. F. Bux
6. John Beardall
7. J. Raven

Citations in the corpus

• Bio-mitigation of carbon dioxide using microalgal systems: Advances and perspectives (2017, background): “The technical benefits of CO2 sequestration are three folds: first, it reduces CO2 concentration in the atmosphere; second, it reduces or avoids CO2 emission if CO2 is to be captured from large stationary sources [5,6]; third, the captured CO2 can be used as a feedstock or substrate for production o”
• Overview of the potential of microalgae for CO2 sequestration (2014, background): “Most often, a highly productive strain functions poorly in dense mass culture, while a robust strain could have low growth rates (Farrelly et al. 2013).”
• Can macroalgae contribute to blue carbon? An Australian perspective (2015, background): “Therefore, while more than 1550 Gt C is stored in the form of biomass, the loss of carbon via these two pathways results in the net sequestration of only 5 GtC yr21 (Raven and Falkowski 1999; Sabine et al. 2004; Lal 2005; Farrelly et al. 2013).”
• Photosynthetic CO2 uptake by microalgae: An attractive tool for biogas upgrading (2015, background): “[11] Farrelly DJ, Everard CD, Fagan CC, McDonnell KP.”