Client participation and outcomes of intensive family preservation services

By Julia H. Littell. 2001

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4cffe66bf967e53dd428a73979d3a7b7a72158a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Megan S. Paceley
2. R. Barth
3. Tamara Fuller
4. Shenyang Guo
5. C. Gibbons
6. J. Schreiber

In General Health Professions

1. Megan S. Paceley
2. Tamara Fuller
3. J. Schreiber

In Safety Research

1. Megan S. Paceley
2. R. Barth
3. Tamara Fuller
4. J. Schreiber

Citations in the corpus

• Propensity score matching strategies for evaluating substance abuse services for child welfare clients (2006, background): “For instance, Littell (2001) found that the outcomes of family preservation services (FPS) varied by the level of service participation, which partially explains why results regarding the effectiveness of FPS are inconsistent.”
• Engagement in child protective services: Parent perceptions of worker skills (2013, background): “Although one study (Littell, 2001) hinted at a relationship between parent compliance (keeping appointments, completing tasks, and cooperation) and child welfare case outcomes (subsequent maltreatment reports and out-of-home placements), another found no evidence of a relationship between…”