Charge Density Dependent Nongeminate Recombination in Organic Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells

By D. Rauh, Carsten Deibel, V. Dyakonov. 2012

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Apparent recombination orders exceeding the value of two expected for bimolecular recombination have been reported for organic solar cells in various publications. Two prominent explanations are bimolecular losses with a carrier concentration dependent prefactor due to a trapping limited mobility and protection of trapped charge carriers from recombination by a donor–acceptor phase separation until re‐emission from these deep states. In order to clarify which mechanism is dominant temperature‐ and illumination‐dependent charge extraction measurements are performed under open circuit and short circuit conditions at poly(3‐hexylthiophene‐2,5‐diyl):[6,6]‐phenyl‐C61 butyric acid methyl ester (P3HT:PC61BM) and PTB7:PC71BM (poly[[4,8‐bis[(2‐ethylhexyl)oxy]benzo[1,2‐b:4,5‐b′]dithiophene‐2,6‐diyl][3‐fluoro‐2‐[(2‐ethylhexyl)carbonyl]thieno[3,4‐b]thiophenediyl]]) solar cells in combination with current–voltage characteristics. It is shown that the charge carrier density n dependence of the mobility μ and the recombination prefactor are different for P3HT:PC61BM at temperatures below 300 K and PTB7:PC71BM at room temperature. Therefore, in addition to μ(n), a detrapping limited recombination in systems with at least partial donor–acceptor phase separation is required to explain the high recombination orders.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Organic Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4ce29856372c89a4d5441c58bf83d63df492112

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. Bernd Ebenhoch
  2. K. Genevičius
  3. I. Samuel
  4. Stuart A. J. Thomson
  5. G. Juška

Citations in the corpus