Socio-Psychological Barriers to Confl ict Resolution
By D. Bar-Tal, Eran Halperin. 2011
99 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4c5eaa1f7285d7773cfef75c256e4e559d70a04
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Eran Halperin
- Ruthie Pliskin
- D. Bar-Tal
- Neta Oren
- Agneta H. Fischer
- Roger Giner-Sorolla
- Daphna Canetti
- Keren Sharvit
In Sociology and Political Science
- Eran Halperin
- D. Bar-Tal
- Ruthie Pliskin
- Neta Oren
- Agneta H. Fischer
- Daphna Canetti
- Roger Giner-Sorolla
- Rafi Nets-Zehngut
Citations in the corpus
- Socio-psychological barriers to peace making: An empirical examination within the Israeli Jewish Society (2011, background): “…integrative theoretical model includes negative intergroup emotional sentiments towards the adversary, which also play a pivotal role in preventing progress towards peaceful conflict resolution (see for example Scheff & Retzinger, 1991; White, 1984; Halperin, 2008, 2011; Halperin et al., 2011a).”
- Sociopsychological analysis of conflict-supporting narratives (2014, background): “In conflict settings individuals experience narrative in more compulsory ways because of the existential insecurity of the group (Hammack, 2010, 2011a).”
- Contempt: Derogating Others While Keeping Calm (2016, background): “…function as rigid associations may have a number of additional functions that strengthen the group and fulfill individual needs in a situation of conflict; for example, reinforcing moral certainty, or maintaining a sense of superiority (Bar-Tal & Halperin, 2011; see also Tajfel & Turner, 1979).”
- Emotions and Emotion Regulation in Intractable Conflict: Studying Emotional Processes Within a Unique Context (2015, background): “The emotional sentiments, or emotional “stories” (Abelson & Prentice, 1989), serve as a glue, holding together the conflict-supporting beliefs contained in the collective memory and ethos (Bar-Tal & Halperin, 2011).”
- Overcoming competitive victimhood and facilitating forgiveness through re-categorization into a common victim or perpetrator identity ☆ (2013, background): “…its related beliefs (such as the narrative negating the outgroup's raison d'être) constitute a core element of group members' identities (Kelman, 2008) people's conflictrelated attitudes and emotions are typically viewed as deeply rooted, rigid, and difficult to change (Bar-Tal & Halperin, 2011).”
- Ethos of conflict: The concept and its measurement. (2012, background): “An understanding of these issues can indicate the feasibility of resolving the conflict peacefully, because EOC also serves as a major sociopsychological barrier to peace building (Bar-Tal & Halperin, 2011: Bar-Tal, Halperin, & Oren, 2010; Halperin & Bar-Tal, 2011).”
- Addressing Empathic Failures (2015, background): “In conflict-intervention contexts, preexisting negative emotions (e.g., anger, suspicion) toward another person or group motivate empathy avoidance and hamper instructed efforts to empathize (Bar-Tal & Halperin, 2011).”
- Exposure to Violence, Ethos of Conflict, and Support for Compromise (2017, background): “These conflict-supporting beliefs become the prism through which society interprets reality, accumulates information, and creates their political attitudes (Bar-Tal 2013; Bar-Tal and Halperin 2011).”
- Socio–Psychological Barriers to Peace Making: The Case of the Israeli Jewish Society (2010, background): “…to a large extent to socio–psychological forces that underlie the disagreements and prevent their resolution, presenting major obstacles to begin and maintain negotiations, to achieve an agreement, and later to engage in the process of reconciliation (see the review by Bar-Tal & Halperin, 2011).”