Electrically charged compact stars and formation of charged black holes
By S. Ray, A. L. Espindola, M. Malheiro, J. Lemos, V. Zanchin. 2003
205 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We study the effect of electric charge in compact stars assuming that the charge distribution is proportional to the mass density. The pressure and the density of the matter inside the stars are large, and the gravitational field is intense. This indicates that electric charge and a strong electric field can also be present. The relativistic hydrostatic equilibrium equation, i.e., the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equation, is modified in order to include electric charge. We perform a detailed numerical study of the effect of electric charge using a polytropic equation of state. We conclude that in order to see any appreciable effect on the phenomenology of the compact stars, the electric fields have to be huge $(\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{21}$ V/m), which implies that the total charge is $Q\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{20}$ Coulomb. From the local effect of the forces experienced on a single charged particle, it is expected that each individual charged particle is quickly ejected from the star. This in turn produces a huge force imbalance, and the gravitational force overwhelms the repulsive Coulomb and fluid pressure forces. The star can then collapse to form a charged black hole before all the charge leaves the system.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e47c31e60c5d36894c0b0326fd90b951164bbb67
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
Citations in the corpus
- On the charge of the Galactic centre black hole (2018, background): “However, a black hole can acquire primordial charge because it was formed by a collapse of a charged (compact) star (Ray et al. 2003).”
- Stellar equilibrium configurations of compact stars in f(R,T) theory of gravity (2015, background): “475 × 10−3 [fm3/MeV]2/3 as in [40, 41].”