The contribution of deep-sea macrohabitat heterogeneity to global nematode diversity
By A. Vanreusel, G. Fonseca, Roberto Danovaro, Maria José da Silva, A. Esteves, T. Ferrero, G. Gad, V. Galtsova, Cristina Gambi, V. Genevois and 22 more. 2010
240 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The great variety of geological and hydrological conditions in the deep sea generates many different habitats. Some are only recently explored, although their true extent and geographical coverage are still not fully established. Both continental margins and mid-oceanic seafloors are much more complex ecologically, geologically, chemically and hydrodynamically than originally thought. As a result, fundamental patterns of species distribution first observed and explained in the context of relatively monotonous slopes and abyssal plains must now be re-evaluated in the light of this newly recognized habitat heterogeneity. Based on a global database of nematode genus composition, collected as part of the Census of Marine Life, we show that macrohabitat heterogeneity contributes significantly to total deep-sea nematode diversity on a global scale. Different deep-sea settings harbour specific nematode assemblages. Some of them, like coral rubble zones or nodule areas, are very diverse habitats. Factors such as increased substrate complexity in the case of nodules and corals seem to facilitate the co-existence of a large number of genera with different modes of life, ranging from sediment dwelling to epifaunal. Furthermore, strong biochemical gradients in the case of vents or seeps are responsible for the success of particular genera, which are not prominent in more typical soft sediments. Many nematode deep-sea genera are cosmopolitan, inhabiting a variety of deep-sea habitats and oceans, whereas only 21% of all deep-sea genera recorded are restricted to a single habitat. In addition to habitat heterogeneity, regional differences are important in structuring nematode assemblages. For instance, seeps from different regions yield different genera that thrive on the sulphidic sediments. This study also shows that many areas and habitats remain highly under-sampled, affecting our ability to understand fully the contribution of habitat heterogeneity versus regional differences to global nematode diversity.
Subfields: Ecology, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4611772f0ab8277faeb4571e870ef7275152bc2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- S. Ahyong
- Michael N. Dawson
- R. Lemaitre
- Farid Dahdouh-Guebas
- P. Mclaughlin
- Nico Koedam
- T. Chan
- J. Guinotte
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- The Whittard Canyon: a case study of submarine canyon processes (2016, unknown): “Deposit feeders are always the dominant trophic guild, as observed for deep-sea sediments worldwide (Soetaert and Heip, 1995; Gambi et al., 2003; Vanhove et al., 2004; Danovaro et al., 2008; Vanreusel et al., 2010; Gambi et al., 2014).”
- Worldwide Analysis of Sedimentary DNA Reveals Major Gaps in Taxonomic Knowledge of Deep-Sea Benthos (2016, background): “…are reported among small-sized eukaryotic taxa such as rotaliid foraminifera (Pawlowski et al., 2007; Gooday and Jorissen, 2012), nematodes (Vanreusel et al., 2010; Zeppilli et al., 2011), and harpacticoid copepods (Menzel et al., 2011), as well as certain macrofaunal and megafaunal taxa…”
- The magnitude of global marine species diversity. (2012, background): “This may be the case for the high predictions of undiscovered species for Fungi and Nematoda [47].”
- Predicting the distribution of vulnerable marine ecosystems in the deep sea using presence-background models (2014, background): “It is now widely recognised that the residual SA present in models may inflate the values of the statistics that are commonly used to measure model performance (Araújo et al., 2005; Hijmans, 2012; Segurado et al., 2006; Veloz, 2009).”