Global climatic drivers of leaf size

By Ian J. Wright, N. Dong, V. Maire, I. C. Prentice, M. Westoby, Sandra Díaz, Rachael V. Gallagher, B. Jacobs, R. Kooyman, Elizabeth A. Law and 7 more. Science, 2017

829 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Leaf size, climate, and energy balance Why does plant leaf size increase at lower latitudes, as exemplified by the evolutionary success of species with very large leaves in the tropics? Wright et al. analyzed leaf data for 7670 plant species, along with climatic data, from 682 sites worldwide. Their findings reveal consistent patterns and explain why earlier predictions from energy balance theory had only limited success. The authors provide a fully quantitative explanation for the latitudinal gradient in leaf size, with implications for plant ecology and physiology, vegetation modeling, and paleobotany. Science, this issue p. 917 Day- and nighttime leaf-to-air temperature differences drive global gradients in leaf size. Leaf size varies by over a 100,000-fold among species worldwide. Although 19th-century plant geographers noted that the wet tropics harbor plants with exceptionally large leaves, the latitudinal gradient of leaf size has not been well quantified nor the key climatic drivers convincingly identified. Here, we characterize worldwide patterns in leaf size. Large-leaved species predominate in wet, hot, sunny environments; small-leaved species typify hot, sunny environments only in arid conditions; small leaves are also found in high latitudes and elevations. By modeling the balance of leaf energy inputs and outputs, we show that daytime and nighttime leaf-to-air temperature differences are key to geographic gradients in leaf size. This knowledge can enrich “next-generation” vegetation models in which leaf temperature and water use during photosynthesis play key roles.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e45875b6c7daf9788a9fe75260117dfcde0721b7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Vanessa Minden
  2. C. Violle
  3. Brian J. Enquist
  4. Josep Peñuelas
  5. S. Haider
  6. A. Moles
  7. Jens‐Christian Svenning
  8. Z. Botta‐Dukát

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. Milan Chytrý
  2. L. Tichý
  3. Jürgen Dengler
  4. C. Violle
  5. Brian J. Enquist
  6. W. Ozinga
  7. F. Jansen
  8. Jens‐Christian Svenning

In Plant Science

  1. Milan Chytrý
  2. L. Tichý
  3. Jürgen Dengler
  4. F. Jansen
  5. W. Ozinga
  6. U. Šilc
  7. J. Ewald
  8. Xavier Font

Citations in the corpus