Estimation of Age-Depth Relationships

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Double the dates and go for Bayes — Impacts of model choice, dating density and quality on chronologies (2018, background): “Adding in error for age-depth model choice substantially 229 reduces the total precision (Bennett, 1994; Blaauw and Heegaard, 2012).”
From Classical to Canonical Ordination (2012, background): “(1992) and Borcard and Legendre (1994), as well as in many applications published since 1992, the spatial relationships were represented in the analysis by a polynomial function of the geographical coordinates of the sampling sites.”
Looking forward through the past: identification of 50 priority research questions in palaeoecology (2014, unknown): “For such projects, issues of chronology often become a primary focus since, unless the records to be combined are on a comparable time-scale (with reliable estimates of uncertainties), robust synthesis is impossible (Blaauw & Heegaard 2012).”