Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve…
By N. Pijls, W. Fearon, P. Tonino, U. Siebert, F. Ikeno, B. Bornschein, M. Van't Veer, Volker Klauss, G. Manoharan, T. Engstrøm and 4 more. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2010
1,149 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e449bb80c94c99809455d30cf73838132ded7627
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Surgery
Citations in the corpus
- Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. (2011, background): “This combined anatomic-physiological evaluation of CAD allows for enhanced clinical decision-making that improves event-free survival, reduces unnecessary revascularization, and lowers healthcare costs (5,6).”
- 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. (2019, positive): “In addition, the 2 year composite risk of death or MI was significantly lower with the FFR-guided PCI strategy.(30) Long-term follow-up at 5 years showed broadly consistent findings, although differences between groups in relation to the primary endpoint were no longer significant.”