A comparative analysis of 9 multi-model averaging approaches in hydrological continuous streamflow simulation

By R. Arsenault, P. Gatien, Benoit Renaud, Francois Brissette, J. Martel. 2015

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e43f7dcac8938af62f05f2ea5829e9e6e038c911

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. C. Murphy
2. Robert L. Wilby
3. Satish Bastola
4. T. Matthews
5. C. Broderick

In Water Science and Technology

1. C. Murphy
2. Robert L. Wilby
3. Satish Bastola
4. T. Matthews
5. C. Broderick

Citations in the corpus

• Transferability of hydrological models and ensemble averaging methods between contrasting climatic periods (2016, methodology): “The results confirm findings from previous studies which stress the value of a multimodel strategy [e.g., Shamseldin et al., 1997; Vel azquez et al., 2010, 2011, Seiller et al., 2012, 2015; Arsenault et al., 2015].”