The use of metal foam projectiles to simulate shock loading on a structure

By D. Radford, V. Deshpande, Norman A. Fleck. 2005

261 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e41238304c8a77d6a89e8de8a2c33c7115077072

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

In Computational Mechanics

Citations in the corpus

Compressive response of multilayered pyramidal lattices during underwater shock loading (2008, background): “[20,21] and Lee et al.”
An underwater shock simulator (2006, background): “Numerous experimental studies have shown that the Alporas metal foam has a negligible strain-rate sensitivity (Dannemann & Lankford 2000; Miyoshi et al. 2002), and that shock wave propagation in these foams becomes very important for impact velocities exceeding about 50 m sK1 ( Radford et al. 2005 )”
Shock enhancement of cellular structures under impact loading: Part I Experiments (2007, methodology): “Experimental setup for image capture Image captures of such kind of test have been reported before in the open literature (Radford et al., 2005, Nemat-Nasser et al; 2007).”
Dynamic compressive behaviour of cellular materials: A review of phenomenon, mechanism and modelling (2018, unknown): “An archived discussion between Tan et al. [208] and Fleck and Deshpande [209] showed their different understandings on this issue.”
Dynamic stress–strain states for metal foams using a 3D cellular model (2014, background): “, 2002) or a viscosity-dominated effect (Radford et al., 2005).”
The response of clamped sandwich plates with metallic foam cores to simulated blast loading (2006, methodology): “, 2002), shock wave propagation in these foams becomes important at impact velocities exceeding about 50 ms 1 (Radford et al., 2005).”
Performance of metallic honeycomb-core sandwich beams under shock loading (2006, methodology): “The properties are given in Table 2, supplemented by compressive stress–strain data from the literature (Radford et al., 2005), with zero artiﬁcial viscosity.”
The impulsive response of sandwich beams: analytical and numerical investigation of regimes of behaviour (2006, background): “Finally, we note that the viscosity Z of the core was chosen such that the shock width (Radford et al., 2005) l ¼ Z D rcv0 ¼ c=10.”
The response of clamped sandwich plates with lattice cores subjected to shock loading (2006, methodology): “This experimental technique has been employed by Radford et al. (2005b) and Rathbun et al. (2005) to investigate the shock resistance of clamped sandwich plates with pyramidal, squarehoneycomb and corrugated lattice cores.”
The response of clamped sandwich beams subjected to shock loading (2006, methodology): “[1], an experimental technique was developed to subject structures to high intensity pressure pulses using metal foam projectiles.”
Response of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels subjected to foam projectile impact - An experimental study (2015, methodology): “[2] developed an experimental technique to generate shock loading into a structure by using metal foam projectiles.”