Comparison of logbook reports of incidental blue shark catch rates by Hawaii-based longline vessels to fishery observer data by application of a generalized additive model

By W. Walsh, P. Kleiber, M. Mccracken. 2002

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e406c03d7b142f4463696d860770f41622f42118

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Rebecca Lewison
2. LB Crowder
3. Mariana M. P. B. Fuentes
4. S. Maxwell
5. K. Laidre
6. Daniel M. Palacios
7. Graham J. Pierce
8. Bryan P. Wallace

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Rebecca Lewison
2. Bj Godley
3. Mariana M. P. B. Fuentes
4. Bryan P. Wallace
5. LB Crowder
6. J. Arnould
7. Daniel M. Palacios
8. J. Moore

Citations in the corpus

• A review of marine mammal, sea turtle and seabird bycatch in USA fisheries and the role of policy in shaping management (2009, background): “Observer programs with adequate vessel coverage provide the most reliable data from which to estimate bycatch in fisheries [17,34,35].”
• Marine mammal conservation: over the horizon (2021, background): “Logbook data self-reported by fishers can be much less reliable than EM data, in particular for discards and bycatch of species of conservation concern, as fishers may have economic or regulatory disincentives to record accurate data, or may be inattentive (e.g. Walsh et al. 2002).”