Coherence a measure of the brain networks: past and present
By Susan M. Bowyer. 2016
314 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Brian connectivity describes the networks of functional and anatomical connections across the brain. The functional network communications across the brain networks dependent on neuronal oscillations. Detection of the synchronous activation of neurons can be used to determine the wellbeing or integrity of the functional connectivity in the human brain networks. Well-connected highly synchronous functional activity can be measured by Electroencephalography (EEG) or Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and then analyzed with several types of mathematical algorithms. Coherence is one mathematical method that can be used to determine if two or more sensors, or brain regions, have similar neuronal oscillatory activity with each other. Since the 1960’s, coherence has generally been assessed on the similarity of the frequency content across EEG sensors. Recently coherence, after it has been imaged in the brain, has been used to assess how coherent or connected specific locations in the brain are networked together in several different neurological disorders. Statistical analysis can then be performed on the coherence results to verify evidence of normal or abnormal network activity in a patient. In this review we highlight how functional brain connectivity is assessed in Source space using coherence technique measured by MEG.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3f7ab250e31010e74bb64d6ae421540269ff07a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- P. Hadar
- Rina Zelmann
- A. Paulk
- P. Salami
- Sydney S. Cash
Citations in the corpus
- The Neurostimulationist will see you now: prescribing direct electrical stimulation therapies for the human brain in epilepsy and beyond (2024, background): “Functional connectivity reflects ongoing physiological correlations between regions (Bowyer, 2016; Solomon et al., 2018; Hebbink et al., 2019; Crocker et al., 2021) while structural connectivity represents the mapped anatomical connections between regions (e.g., white matter connectivity; Basser et…”