Does increased board independence reduce earnings management? Evidence from recent regulatory reforms

By Xia Chen, Qiang Cheng, Xin Wang. Review of accounting studies, 2015

282 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We examine whether recent regulatory reforms requiring majority board independence reduce the extent of earnings management. Firms that did not have a majority of independent directors before the reforms (referred to as noncompliant firms) are required to increase their board independence. We find that, while noncompliant firms on average do not experience a significant decrease in earnings management after the reforms compared to other firms, noncompliant firms with low information acquisition cost experience a significant reduction in earnings management. The results are similar when we examine audit committee independence and when we use alternative proxies for information acquisition cost and earnings management. These findings indicate that independent directors’ monitoring is more effective in a richer information environment.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3e65ba90bef9ecb1fdc48dc5e7d9539c85ee15f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

  1. Christopher S. Armstrong
  2. W. Guay
  3. John E. Core
  4. Jens Hagendorff
  5. Angelica Gonzalez
  6. Vathunyoo Sila
  7. David F. Larcker
  8. Christian Leuz

In Strategy and Management

  1. Christopher S. Armstrong
  2. John E. Core
  3. W. Guay
  4. Angelica Gonzalez
  5. Jens Hagendorff
  6. Vathunyoo Sila
  7. Christian Leuz
  8. Peter D. Wysocki

Citations in the corpus