Shareholder Voting and Corporate Governance Around the World

211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Do board characteristics drive firm performance? An international perspective (2019, background): “…country, such as Australia, Japan and UK (Kiel and Nicholson 2003; Ullah 2017; Weir and Laing 2001; Chang et al. 2015), while a few papers, as far as we know, have drawn on a sample of several countries (e.g. Fauver et al. 2017; Claessens and Yurtoglu 2013; Kim and Lu 2013; Iliev et al. 2015).”
Say on Pay Laws, Executive Compensation, Pay Slice, and Firm Valuation around the World (2013, background): “, Kaplan (2007), Bainbridge (2008), Gordon (2009)) with a negative effect on the valuations of some firms (Larcker, Ormazabal, and Taylor (2011)), and that pension funds’ actions on executive compensation may be driven by some political agendas, potentially destroying shareholder value (Bainbridge (”
Drivers behind the monitoring effectiveness of global institutional investors: Evidence from earnings management (2016, unknown): “3 Aggarwal et al. (2011) and Iliev et al. (2015) provide empirical evidence and exemplary cases in which foreign institutional investors influence governance outcomes via channels such as voting and proxy fights.”