A Haar wavelet-based perceptual similarity index for image quality assessment

By Rafael Reisenhofer, Sebastian Bosse, Gitta Kutyniok, Thomas Wiegand. Signal processing. Image communication, 2016

322 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract In most practical situations, the compression or transmission of images and videos creates distortions that will eventually be perceived by a human observer. Vice versa, image and video restoration techniques, such as inpainting or denoising, aim to enhance the quality of experience of human viewers. Correctly assessing the similarity between an image and an undistorted reference image as subjectively experienced by a human viewer can thus lead to significant improvements in any transmission, compression, or restoration system. This paper introduces the Haar wavelet-based perceptual similarity index (HaarPSI), a novel and computationally inexpensive similarity measure for full reference image quality assessment. The HaarPSI utilizes the coefficients obtained from a Haar wavelet decomposition to assess local similarities between two images, as well as the relative importance of image areas. The consistency of the HaarPSI with the human quality of experience was validated on four large benchmark databases containing thousands of differently distorted images. On these databases, the HaarPSI achieves higher correlations with human opinion scores than state-of-the-art full reference similarity measures like the structural similarity index (SSIM), the feature similarity index (FSIM), and the visual saliency-based index (VSI). Along with the simple computational structure and the short execution time, these experimental results suggest a high applicability of the HaarPSI in real world tasks.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3c0c5be84738292bc6cdb7d2df054076331ee67

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. K. Müller
  2. Wojciech Samek
  3. Thomas Wiegand
  4. Grgoire Montavon
  5. Pradeep Sen
  6. Hong Cai
  7. Ekta Prashnani
  8. Yasamin Mostofi

In Media Technology

  1. K. Müller
  2. Wojciech Samek
  3. Thomas Wiegand
  4. Sebastian Bosse
  5. Hong Cai
  6. Dominique Maniry
  7. Pradeep Sen
  8. Ekta Prashnani

Citations in the corpus