Measuring loneliness in later life: a comparison of differing measures
By Christina Victor, L. Grenade, D. Boldy. 2005
164 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Health, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3b9d69197706d299980391920943e2eabbd935d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health
- Keming Yang
- Emilie Courtin
- Martin Knapp
- J. Twigg
- W. Martin
- Christina Victor
- Netta Achdut
- Tehila Refaeli
In Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness among older people: an integrative review (2018, background): “Some studies used single-item indicators which may undermine the validity of results; however, research has indicated that single-item measures can correlate strongly with more complex measures (Victor et al. 2005).”
- Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review (2017, result): “Although previous studies have shown that a single-item measure correlates strongly with more sophisticated scales (Victor et al. 2005), recent research has emphasised the importance of contrasting different dimensions of loneliness (Coyle and Dugan 2012).”
- Routledge Handbook of Cultural Gerontology (2015, background): “A key criticism of such measures is that that they will not elicit a ‘true’ response: they will generate only a ‘publicly acceptable’ response given the stigmatizing nature of loneliness (Victor et al., 2005).”
- The prevalence of and risk factors for loneliness among older people in China (2008, background): “Great Britain, Australia and Scandinavia), and to answer questions that make up composite scales (as in Australia and The Netherlands) (Victor et al. 2005b).”