Estimation of badger abundance using faecal DNA typing
By G. Wilson, A. Frantz, L. C. Pope, T. Roper, T. Burke, C. Cheeseman, R. Delahay. 2003
86 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3b58e27c644b6d9833304d9bca76fe8d8787bed
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Jon E. Swenson
- E. Bellemain
- P. Taberlet
- David A. Tallmon
- J. Gaillard
- Olav Drageset
- Knut Håkon Solberg
- S. Brunberg
Citations in the corpus
- Empirical evaluation of non‐invasive capture–mark–recapture estimation of population size based on a single sampling session (2007, background): “age are the factors usually put forward to explain such differences (Kohn et al. 1999; Wilson et al. 2003).”
- Importance of a pilot study for non-invasive genetic sampling: genotyping errors and population size estimation in red deer (2006, background): “Population size estimates from faeces have been conducted successfully for coyote (Canis latrans, Kohn et al. 1999), wolf (Canis lupus, Creel et al. 2003), African forest elephant (Loxodonta cyclotis, Eggert et al. 2003) and the European badger (Meles meles, Wilson et al. 2003 ).”
- Characterization of target nuclear DNA from faeces reduces technical issues associated with the assumptions of low-quality and quantity template (2007, background): “Consequently, many researchers have adopted protocols that potentially increase processing time, cost (Wilson et al. 2003), and analytical error (Gill et al.”
- Estimating Population Size of Elusive Animals with DNA from Hunter‐Collected Feces: Four Methods for Brown Bears (2005, methodology): “Wilson et al. (2003) had to combine the use of trapping records and fecal genotypes of Eurasian badgers (Meles meles) to obtain a reliable estimate of group size because each method on its own yielded sampling sizes that were too small.”
- Estimating population size by genotyping remotely plucked hair: the Eurasian badger (2004, methodology): “In a previous study, accurate estimates of badger group size were obtained by generating genetic profiles from badger faeces (Frantz et al . 2003; Wilson et al . 2003 ).”
- An evaluation of field and non-invasive genetic methods to estimate brown bear (Ursus arctos) population size (2006, methodology): “Non-invasive genetic methods have recently been used to estimate population sizes (Kohn et al., 1999; Banks et al., 2002, 2003; Eggert et al., 2003; Wilson et al., 2003; Flagstad et al., 2004; Bellemain et al., 2005).”
- Management of disease in wild mammals (2009, background): “Rabbit distribution is also clustered at national, regional and local scales, being influenced by availability of suitable habitat patches and the structure and quality of corridors between them (Wilson et al. 2002; Carvallo and Gomes 2003).”