The bleak future of NAND flash memory

By Laura M. Grupp, John D. Davis, Steven Swanson. USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies, 2012

347 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e397699dcca8765dd161eaa9430db07cb07bc3f3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Anand Sivasubramaniam
2. Q. Wei
3. Cheng Chen
4. Bingsheng He
5. Fei Wu
6. Laura Caulfield
7. Chundong Wang
8. Di Wang

Citations in the corpus

• NV-Tree: Reducing Consistency Cost for NVM-based Single Level Systems (2015, methodology): “As shown in Table 1, flash is faster than HDD but is still unsuitable to replace DRAM due to much higher latency and limited endurance [24].”
• SCORE (2018, background): “On the one hand, flash technologies scaling results in degraded reliability [22, 61, 76].”
• SSD Failures in Datacenters: What? When? and Why? (2016, background): “Several works have examined failure trends of raw flash chips [4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 16, 26, 32].”