Identifying viruses from metagenomic data using deep learning
By Jie Jessie Ren, Kai Song, Chao Deng, Nathan A. Ahlgren, Jed A. Fuhrman, Yi Li, Xiaohui S. Xie, Ryan Poplin, Fengzhu Sun. Quantitative Biology, 2020
553 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Background The recent development of metagenomic sequencing makes it possible to massively sequence microbial genomes including viral genomes without the need for laboratory culture. Existing reference-based and gene homology-based methods are not efficient in identifying unknown viruses or short viral sequences from metagenomic data. Methods Here we developed a reference-free and alignment-free machine learning method, DeepVirFinder, for identifying viral sequences in metagenomic data using deep learning. Results Trained based on sequences from viral RefSeq discovered before May 2015, and evaluated on those discovered after that date, DeepVirFinder outperformed the state-of-the-art method VirFinder at all contig lengths, achieving AUROC 0.93, 0.95, 0.97, and 0.98 for 300, 500, 1000, and 3000 bp sequences respectively. Enlarging the training data with additional millions of purified viral sequences from metavirome samples further improved the accuracy for identifying virus groups that are under-represented. Applying DeepVirFinder to real human gut metagenomic samples, we identified 51,138 viral sequences belonging to 175 bins in patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Ten bins were found associated with the cancer status, suggesting viruses may play important roles in CRC. Conclusions Powered by deep learning and high throughput sequencing metagenomic data, DeepVirFinder significantly improved the accuracy of viral identification and will assist the study of viruses in the era of metagenomics.
Subfields: Animal Science and Zoology, Ecology, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3681cef0f89bbe6712da675ed92970d518cddf4
Citations in the corpus
- Identification of mobile genetic elements with geNomad (2023, unknown): “VIBRANT 31 , geNomad, VirSorter2 (default parameters) and DeepMicroClass achieved the highest classification precision (97.5%, 97.3%, 94.7% and 92.6%, respectively), and Seeker 32 , DeepVirFinder 33 and PPR-Meta obtained the lowest scores (61.8%, 80.5% and 88.5%, respectively).”