Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications

By Isaac I. Kim, B. McArthur, E. Korevaar. SPIE Optics East, 2001

1,069 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e36258c3a8e71b23e8f97348c7a1dd2c78aead56

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Free Space Optical Communications — Theory and Practices (2014, background): “The different types of atmospheric constituents' sizes and concentrations of the different types of atmospheric constituents are listed in Table (2) [7,9].”
Modeling of Fog and Smoke Attenuation in Free Space Optical Communications Link Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions (2013, methodology): “Kim modified the Kruse model using theoretical assumptions for the fog by defining values as follows [16]:”
Weather effects on hybrid FSO/RF communication link (2009, background): “The simulations show that this effect is more prominently observed for Kruse model as the Kim model does not show any wavelength dependent attenuation behaviour against a visibility range lower than 500 m.”
ProjecToR: Agile Reconfigurable Data Center Interconnect (2016, background): “2 dB/km for 1550 nm wavelength [24]—is negligible given our distances of 100s of meters.”
Emerging Optical Wireless Communications-Advances and Challenges (2015, neutral): “5 km [56].”
Outage Capacity Optimization for Free-Space Optical Links With Pointing Errors (2007, background): “It can be expressed in terms of the visibility, which can be measured directly from the atmosphere [22], [23].”
Survey on Free Space Optical Communication: A Communication Theory Perspective (2014, background): “01 and 1 μm, whereas fog droplets have radius between 1 to 20 μm, and hence, the beam light suffers from less attenuation in haze conditions [80].”
Free-Space Optical Communication with Nonzero Boresight Pointing Errors (2014, methodology): “NUMERICAL RESULTS In this section, we adopt the system settings shown in Table I, which are used in many practical terrestrial FSO communication systems [2], [17], [39].”
Channel modeling for terrestrial free space optical links (2005, background): “1 Fog Attenuation The theoretical background of fog attenuation for light based on Mie Scattering can be found in [4-6] and is not being dealt with here.”
Optical Wireless Communications With Heterodyne Detection Over Turbulence Channels With Pointing Errors (2009, background): “In previous two figures, we assumed a normalized jitter value, , and a constant path loss factor, , which is a typical value for clear weather conditions [23].”
An Introduction to Free-space Optical Communications (2010, methodology): “Further, [21] proposed another expression for the parameter q, which was given by Kruse as defined in equation (8).”
Optical Communication in Space: Challenges and Mitigation Techniques (2017, methodology): “determined using Kim or Kruse model [91], [92].”