Economic Returns to Energy-Efficient Investments in the Housing Market: Evidence from Singapore

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Energy Performance Ratings and House Prices in Wales: An Empirical Study (2015, background): “Similar to Deng et al. (2012), overall they estimate an average price premium of about 4-5%.”
Economic returns to residential green building investment: The developers' perspective☆ (2014, methodology): “Using a similar procedure as Deng et al. (2012), we match the nonGM-rated units to GM-rated units using propensity-score matching procedures.”
The capitalization of green labels in the California housing market (2014, background): “In Singapore, Yongheng Deng et al. (2012) document that homes labeled under the governmentdesigned Green Mark scheme sell for a 4–6% price premium.”
Getting Green with Solar Subsidies: Evidence from the California Solar Initiative (2015, background): “Recent evidence suggests that residential and commercial buildings certified as sustainable or energy efficient by “green labeling” programs sell or lease for higher prices relative to comparable uncertified buildings (Deng, Li, and Quigley 2012; Eichholtz, Kok, and Quigley 2013; Kahn and Kok 2014).”
The role of information for energy efficiency in the residential sector (2015, unknown): “Deng et al. (2012) used a hedonic model with two stages to control for the location effect of apartment buildings in Singapore.”