Constraining the Galaxy's dark halo with RAVE stars

By T. Piffl, J. Binney, P. McMillan, Matthias Steinmetz, A. Helmi, R. Wyse, O. Bienaym'e, Joss Bland-Hawthorn, Kenneth C. Freeman, B. Gibson and 10 more. 2014

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We use the kinematics of ∼200000 giant stars that lie within ∼1.5kpc of the plane to measure the vertical profile of mass density near the Sun. We find that the dark mass contained within the isodensity surface of the dark halo that passes through the Sun ((6 ± 0.9) × 10 10 M� ), and the surface density within 0.9kpc of the plane ((69 ± 10)Mpc −2 ) are almost inde- pendent of the (oblate) halo's axis ratio q. If the halo is spherical, 46 per cent of the radial force on the Sun is provided by baryons, and only 4.3 per cent of the Galaxy's mass is baryonic. If the halo is flattened, the baryons contribute even less strongly to the local ra- dial force and to the Galaxy's mass. The dark matter density at the location of the Sun is 0.0126q −0.89 Mpc −3 = 0.48q −0.89 GeVcm −3 . When combined with other literature results we find hints for a mildly oblate dark halo with q � 0.8. Our value for the dark mass within the solar radius is larger than that predicted by cosmological dark-matter-only simulations but in good agreement with simulations once the effects of baryonic infall are taken into account. Our mass models consist of three double-exponential discs, an oblate bulge and a Navarro- Frenk-White dark matter halo, and we model the dynamics of the RAVE (RAdial Velocity Experiment) stars in the corresponding gravitational fields by finding distribution functions f(J) that depend on three action integrals. Statistical errors are completely swamped by systematic uncertainties, the most important of which are the distance to the stars in the pho- tometric and spectroscopic samples and the solar distance to the Galactic Centre. Systematics other than the flattening of the dark halo yield overall uncertainties ∼15percent.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3518c48b813cd2e5a6b3622bd017222719e4ac6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Joss Bland-Hawthorn
  2. Volker Springel
  3. Carlos S. Frenk
  4. P. Hopkins
  5. Simon D. M. White
  6. I. Minchev
  7. O. Gerhard
  8. P. McMillan

In Instrumentation

  1. Carlos S. Frenk
  2. Joss Bland-Hawthorn
  3. P. McMillan
  4. Volker Springel
  5. O. Gerhard
  6. J. Navarro
  7. Simon D. M. White
  8. Joop Schaye

Citations in the corpus