Antidepressant Efficacy of Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: A Two-Site Randomized Controlled Trial

By J. Murrough, D. Iosifescu, Lee C Chang, Rayan K. Al Jurdi, C. Green, A. M. Perez, S. Iqbal, S. Pillemer, A. Foulkes, Asim A. Shah and 2 more. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2013

1,140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Objective Ketamine, a glutamate N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, has shown rapid antidepressant effects, but small study groups and inadequate control conditions in prior studies have precluded a definitive conclusion. The authors evaluated the rapid antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in a large group of patients with treatment-resistant major depression. Method This was a two-site, parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial of a single infusion of ketamine compared to an active placebo control condition, the anesthetic midazolam. Patients with treatment-resistant major depression experiencing a major depressive episode were randomly assigned under double-blind conditions to receive a single intravenous infusion of ketamine or midazolam in a 2:1 ratio (N=73). The primary outcome was change in depression severity 24 hours after drug administration, as assessed by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Results The ketamine group had greater improvement in the MADRS score than the midazolam group 24 hours after treatment. After adjustment for baseline scores and site, the MADRS score was lower in the ketamine group than in the midazolam group by 7.95 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.20 to 12.71). The likelihood of response at 24 hours was greater with ketamine than with midazolam (odds ratio, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.21 to 4.14), with response rates of 64% and 28%, respectively. Conclusions Ketamine demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects in an optimized study design, further supporting NMDA receptor modulation as a novel mechanism for accelerated improvement in severe and chronic forms of depression. More information on response durability and safety is required before implementation in clinical practice.

Subfields: Biological Psychiatry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e34f931c9acf4eb7089a7a613a81eed1d3cfa069

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biological Psychiatry

  1. Anthony A. Grace
  2. P. Belujon

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

  1. P. Belujon
  2. Anthony A. Grace

In Pharmacology

  1. P. Belujon
  2. Anthony A. Grace

Citations in the corpus