Practical Differential Privacy for SQL Queries Using Elastic Sensitivity
By Noah M. Johnson, Joseph P. Near, Dawn Song. 2017
36 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Tianhao Wang
- Ninghui Li
- Ashwin Machanavajjhala
- Michael Hay
- Somesh Jha
- Gerome Miklau
- Ios Kotsogiannis
- Amrita Roy Chowdhury
Citations in the corpus
- Ekiden: A Platform for Confidentiality-Preserving, Trustworthy, and Performant Smart Contracts (2018, neutral): “, restricting requests based on requester identity and/or a differential-privacy budget [33, 51], require persistent counters.”
- CALM: Consistent Adaptive Local Marginal for Marginal Release under Local Differential Privacy (2018, methodology): “In recent years, differential privacy [13, 14] has been increasingly accepted as the de facto standard for data privacy in the research community [3, 15, 21, 24, 27].”
- Cryptϵ: Crypto-Assisted Differential Privacy on Untrusted Servers (2019, background): “Support for multi-table queries like joins would require protocols for computing sensitivity [62] and data truncation [68].”
- PrivateSQL: A Differentially Private SQL Query Engine (2019, background): “The privacy model in FLEX [24] considers neighboring tables that differ in exactly one row in one relation.”
- Locally Differentially Private Frequent Itemset Mining (2018, methodology): “Recently, Uber has deployed a system enforcing DP during SQL queries [23], Google also proposed several works that combine DP with machine learning, e.”
- Locally Differentially Private Heavy Hitter Identification (2017, methodology): “In recent years, differential privacy [11], [12] has been increasingly accepted as the de facto standard for data privacy in the research community [3], [13], [20], [22], [27].”