Electrical energy storage systems: A comparative life cycle cost analysis
By Behnam Zakeri, S. Syri. 2015
1,719 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3315a2156b2f27484f8df4d722d638328d84847
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
- Malcolm Duncan McCulloch
- Federico E. Milano
- Umer Akram
- Mithulananthan Nadarajah
- Rakibuzzaman Shah
- Claus Daniel
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Tom Brown
- David P. Schlachtberger
- S. Schramm
- Martin Greiner
- Malcolm Duncan McCulloch
- Federico E. Milano
- Taha Selim Ustun
- Chun Sing Lai
Citations in the corpus
- Energy Storage Technology and Cost Characterization Report (2019, background): “Zakeri and Syri (2015) provided PCS and BOP costs for various BESS chemistries, but the numbers were grouped together, so separate costs could not be obtained.”
- Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and economic review (2016, background): “Although this option is the cheapest option of all storage methods mentioned here, this storage is better suited for high capacity, long term hydrogen storage [46,51].”
- Comparative Review of Energy Storage Systems, Their Roles, and Impacts on Future Power Systems (2019, background): “Storage services, applications and remarks [43], [96], [116], [142], [227], [233], [235]–[238].”
- Synergies of sector coupling and transmission reinforcement in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system (2018, background): “The usage of existing underground caverns to store hydrogen could be more than 10 times cheaper [63, 64], but a study of cavern potentials across Europe was not within the scope of this study.”
- Analysis of flow field design on vanadium redox flow battery performance: Development of 3D computational fluid dynamic model and experimental validation (2018, neutral): “…the commercialization of VRFBs continues to be hindered by technological issues, among which the mass transport of the electrolyte over the porous electrode is one of the most important [4,6], as it leads to increased overpotential at high current and limits the power density of the system [7,8].”