On taking the D → 4 limit of Gauss-Bonnet gravity: theory and solutions

By Robie A. Hennigar, D. Kubizňák, Robert B. Mann, Christopher Pollack. 2020

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We comment on the recently introduced Gauss-Bonnet gravity in four dimensions. We argue that it does not make sense to consider this theory to be defined by a set of D → 4 solutions of the higher-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet gravity. We show that a well-defined D → 4 limit of Gauss-Bonnet Gravity is obtained generalizing a method employed by Mann and Ross to obtain a limit of the Einstein gravity in D = 2 dimensions. This is a scalar-tensor theory of the Horndeski type obtained by dimensional reduction methods. By considering simple spacetimes beyond spherical symmetry (Taub-NUT spaces) we show that the naive limit of the higher-dimensional theory to D = 4 is not well defined and contrast the resultant metrics with the actual solutions of the new theory.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3295df8537e7e329fba6cc66b7b24417ad99bb3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Rahul Kumar
  2. Sushant G. Ghosh
  3. Xiao-Xiong Zeng
  4. Hongbao Zhang
  5. Hai-Qing Zhang
  6. S. Mukohyama
  7. Shafqat Ul Islam
  8. Peng-Cheng Li

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Rahul Kumar
  2. Sushant G. Ghosh
  3. Xiao-Xiong Zeng
  4. Hongbao Zhang
  5. Hai-Qing Zhang
  6. S. Mukohyama
  7. Shafqat Ul Islam
  8. Peng-Cheng Li

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. S. Mukohyama
  2. Rahul Kumar
  3. Hongbao Zhang
  4. Shafqat Ul Islam
  5. Hai-Qing Zhang
  6. Xiao-Xiong Zeng
  7. Sushant G. Ghosh
  8. Peng-Cheng Li

Citations in the corpus